Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Obama's response for Farm Bill vote absence

You may have read here that I was pretty miffed at Obama's absence at the Farm Bill voting. I was rather torn because I thought I might want him to be president, but I thought his absence from the majority of reform amendment votes was a sign that he just wasn't walking the walk for all of his talk. Well, I told him about it and he (or his office anyway)emailed me back a very detailed letter about the subject. I am actually pretty satisfied with his response. It was so detailed and so long that I will not post the whole thing here, but here is a highlight:

"Thank you for advising me of your concern that my presidential campaign is detracting from my responsibilities as a United States Senator. I appreciate your candor.

I initially ran for the Senate because I felt this venue would provide an opportunity to work to improve our society for all its citizens. I arrived in the Senate in January 2005, and it quickly became clear to me that until the Democrats regained the ability to set the legislative agenda by being the majority party in Congress, not much would change. "

"After much reflection, I concluded that I could best address these problems by running for president in 2008. I initiated this campaign in February 2007, but my top priority remains serving the people of Illinois. My work as a Senator continues – listening to the concerns and needs of constituents, advancing legislation that will make our country safer, stronger, and more just, and fighting for our shared priorities in Congress. "

"You mentioned your concern that I have missed some votes this year. As I engage in my dual challenge, I have made a point of keeping Majority Leader Reid and Assistant Leader Durbin apprised of my travel schedule so that I can adjust it any time they think I might miss a contested vote. As a result, I have not missed any votes where my vote would have changed the outcome."

There is a LOT more than that with specifics on what he has done as a senator this year. I am officially mollified for now and if it is true that Durbin could have called him back at any time, then I bow to the judgement of Senator Durbin as he is one of the top Reform Dudes. I appreciate that his office gave a response, so I feel obligated to retract my ire in this format!

Monday, January 7, 2008

Chicago Trib highlights poverty in "Our Hidden Poor"

The Chicago Tribune ran a remarkable profile on individuals living in poverty in IL. You can hear some of the people profiled speaking in their own words with a slideshow. You can read their detailed stories by clicking on the link below the video.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/specials/chi-071212poverty-htmlpage,0,905201.htmlpage?coll=chi_news_opinion_util

Saturday, January 5, 2008

Why are food bank donations down?

The Gleaner’s Community Food Bank of Southeastern Michigan reported a 35% decline in overall donations in 2007. In Washington, DC last month, the Capital Area Food bank supplies were down 60% compared to a year ago. The story is the same everywhere, including my local Niles Food Pantry: Less available food at food pantries. Images of empty shelves at food banks are evidence of what we don’t see…empty refrigerators and empty bellies. In a land of plenty, why is this happening? Here are 5 reasons why donations have dramatically declined:

1. Increase in demand: America’s Second Harvest’s member food pantries have seen demand increases nationwide, sometimes as high as 20%.
2. Strong farm economy: Drought and strong international markets reduced food surplus for the government to buy cheaply. This was great for farmers, but bad for a system reliant upon bonus commodities to feed the hungry. In five years, the U.S. Department of Agriculture steadily decreased its purchase of surplus food from $200 million to an estimated $58million.
3. Fewer damaged goods from manufacturers: Increased efficiency conserves money and resources. Yet salvage products, edible food in damaged packaging, are a significant source of donations. At the Greater Chicago Food Depository, these contributions have fallen by 42% since 2004.
4. Decrease in grocery store donations: Better controls over store-ordering procedures reduce overstock and donations. Supermarket chain consolidation also decreases giving opportunities.
5. Inflation: Support for the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) is re-authorized only every five years. $140 million todays doesn’t buy as much as it did in 2002.

The accumulated effects of these trends are devastating to thousands of individuals and families. So the question remains: ‘What can we do?’
- Pass a strong nutrition title in the U.S. Farm Bill. Congress can increase support for TEFAP and the Food Stamp Program.
- Develop community hunger relief projects: City wide programs like Chicago’s “One City, One Food Drive” promote awareness while making it easy for everyone to participate. Any community group can hold a food drive.
- Make personal donations: Local food banks or America’s Second Harvest can make your money go further than your food donations. They buy more food per dollar than individuals and know the needs of their patrons.
- Increase corporate giving: Businesses can make financial or in-kind donations. More food manufacturers can donate salvage products. Restaurants, grocery stores, and caterers can participate in food rescue programs, which re-distribute perishable and prepared foods.

The desperation felt by someone turned away empty-handed from a food pantry is hard to fathom in the midst of abundance. Yet it is a growing reality. The good news is that this problem can be overcome. With even modest acts of compassion and political action we can move nourishing food to food bank shelves and then into homes where it belongs.