Rev. David Beckmann, president of Bread for the World, recently appeared on Religion and Ethics Newsweekly to discuss hunger in America and talk about the most recent Hunger Report put out by BFW. This brief interview touches on the status of hunger and a bit about how we are shifting from providing emergency assistance to fighting poverty itself.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week1112/perspectives.html
I’m an author, mom, speaker, & activist. I wrote the book “From Changing Diapers to Changing the World: Why Moms Make Great Advocates & How to Get Started.” My insights are seen through the lens of motherhood and a desire to help moms uplift each other to make a better world for our kids. Visit my main webpage at www.changyit.com For tips on how to take advocacy actions, type "Advocacy Made Easy." in the search bar! By Cynthia Changyit Levin www.changyit.com
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Sunday, November 25, 2007
Are food banks distracting us from ending poverty???
Here's something you don't see every day. A truly controversial op-ed about Food Banks. From the Washington Post comes "When Handouts Keep Coming, the Food Line Never Ends." It is a challenging look at the way our system of food banks do business. Feeding people is good, but are we really working toward ending poverty or are we just creating more demand and more efficiently handling food waste? No matter what you think about the opinion, I believe the article gives the background for why every soup kitchen worker should also be engaged in contacting members of Congress to make real changes to put themselves out of business (see links to RESULTS or Bread for the World to get involved). Here's an excerpt:
"My experience of 25 years in food banking has led me to conclude that co-dependency within the system is multifaceted and frankly troubling. As a system that depends on donated goods, it must curry favor with the nation's food industry, which often regards food banks as a waste-management tool. As an operation that must sort through billions of pounds of damaged and partially salvageable food, it requires an army of volunteers who themselves are dependent on the carefully nurtured belief that they are "doing good" by "feeding the hungry." And as a charity that lives from one multimillion-dollar capital campaign to the next (most recently, the Hartford food bank raised $4.5 million), it must maintain a ready supply of well-heeled philanthropists and captains of industry to raise the dollars and public awareness necessary to make the next warehouse expansion possible.
Food banks are a dominant institution in this country, and they assert their power at the local and state levels by commanding the attention of people of good will who want to address hunger. Their ability to attract volunteers and to raise money approaches that of major hospitals and universities. While none of this is inherently wrong, it does distract the public and policymakers from the task of harnessing the political will needed to end hunger in the United States."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/16/AR2007111601213.html?referrer=emailarticle&sid=http://www.washingthttp://www.washingtonpost.com:80/ac2/wp-dyn?node=admin/registration/register&sub=AR&sid=ST2007111900638
"My experience of 25 years in food banking has led me to conclude that co-dependency within the system is multifaceted and frankly troubling. As a system that depends on donated goods, it must curry favor with the nation's food industry, which often regards food banks as a waste-management tool. As an operation that must sort through billions of pounds of damaged and partially salvageable food, it requires an army of volunteers who themselves are dependent on the carefully nurtured belief that they are "doing good" by "feeding the hungry." And as a charity that lives from one multimillion-dollar capital campaign to the next (most recently, the Hartford food bank raised $4.5 million), it must maintain a ready supply of well-heeled philanthropists and captains of industry to raise the dollars and public awareness necessary to make the next warehouse expansion possible.
Food banks are a dominant institution in this country, and they assert their power at the local and state levels by commanding the attention of people of good will who want to address hunger. Their ability to attract volunteers and to raise money approaches that of major hospitals and universities. While none of this is inherently wrong, it does distract the public and policymakers from the task of harnessing the political will needed to end hunger in the United States."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/16/AR2007111601213.html?referrer=emailarticle&sid=http://www.washingthttp://www.washingtonpost.com:80/ac2/wp-dyn?node=admin/registration/register&sub=AR&sid=ST2007111900638
Friday, November 16, 2007
What the heck is Cloture? See below for answer..
A little debate lesson from the Center for Rural Affairs blog. Short story is that the farm bill is on hold again...
"The cloture vote on the farm bill failed, so the farm bill is put on hold until at least December. Starting later today, the Senate will go on a 2 week vacation- I mean recess- for Thanksgiving,
For those who have better things to do with their time than keep up on Senate procedural terms, all “cloture” means is that the Senate has a vote to end debate and proceed to actual consideration of a bill for a set period of time, at which point there would be a vote on the bill. Since Senate procedure usually allows for unlimited debate, cloture is the primary way in which the Senate forces an end to debate on a bill and schedules an actual vote.
The key, of course, is that you need 60 votes to win a cloture vote. Not a simple majority. Since there are 51 Democrats in the Senate, they needed 9 Republicans to break with their party and vote for cloture. That didn’t happen, so now the farm bill is put on the back burner for a time- but nobody really knows how long. We’ll have more commentary later today."
http://www.cfra.org/blog/
"The cloture vote on the farm bill failed, so the farm bill is put on hold until at least December. Starting later today, the Senate will go on a 2 week vacation- I mean recess- for Thanksgiving,
For those who have better things to do with their time than keep up on Senate procedural terms, all “cloture” means is that the Senate has a vote to end debate and proceed to actual consideration of a bill for a set period of time, at which point there would be a vote on the bill. Since Senate procedure usually allows for unlimited debate, cloture is the primary way in which the Senate forces an end to debate on a bill and schedules an actual vote.
The key, of course, is that you need 60 votes to win a cloture vote. Not a simple majority. Since there are 51 Democrats in the Senate, they needed 9 Republicans to break with their party and vote for cloture. That didn’t happen, so now the farm bill is put on the back burner for a time- but nobody really knows how long. We’ll have more commentary later today."
http://www.cfra.org/blog/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)